Gold & Silver

Gold & Silver

Launching a new investment category at Stable Money through phased delivery, trust-first UX, and post-launch iteration.

Role

Senior Product Designer · Sole

Duration

Jul 2025 – Oct 2025

Team

1 PM • 1 Business • 3 engineers

I WAS RESPONSIBLE FOR

research synthesis
defining UX direction
flow design and IA
end-to-end product experience
trust and education layers
post-launch improvements and feature thinking
TIMELINE

PROJECT TIMELInE

Portfolio header

One big number.
Gains right below it.

Public leads with total portfolio value and shows all-time gain/loss directly beneath — one visual unit. Plum does the same: "Your Plum value · £142.83 · ▲ £23.91 past week." Both confirm the same hierarchy works. We adopted it as-is for the Stable Net Worth header.

Category breakdown

Rows, not charts.
Asset type, not instrument.

Public breaks portfolio value into named asset rows (Stocks, Bonds, Cash) — no pie chart. Kraken shows a live price chart with time selectors instead. Public's approach is readable at a glance; Kraken's creates volatility stress. For an FD/bond audience that holds for months, rows win every time.

Zero state

Make the empty state
earn its keep.

Public's zero state uses compounding math to make inaction feel costly — "If you invested $500 ten years ago, you'd have $1,600 now." Acorns keeps the surface alive even at $0, showing a Performance card so the product feels real before use. Both principles made it into our design: real numbers + anticipation of value.

Upcoming events

Investment-native reminders.
Not a task manager.

Quicken has a Reminders section — the right idea, wrong execution. It lists insurance payments, subscriptions, and bills alongside investments. We took the concept of surfacing upcoming obligations but scoped it tightly to investment events only: maturity dates, SIP installments, payout dates. Anything else belongs on a different surface.

Zero state

Make the empty state
earn its keep.

Public's zero state uses compounding math to make inaction feel costly — "If you invested $500 ten years ago, you'd have $1,600 now." Acorns keeps the surface alive even at $0, showing a Performance card so the product feels real before use. Both principles made it into our design: real numbers + anticipation of value.

REFLECTION

WHAT I LEARNED

1

The biggest decisions weren't screen-level.

2

Transparency and cross-sell aren't in tension.

3

The zero state deserved more time.

Project Snapshot

Launching Gold & Silver as a trusted new investment category

Launching Gold & Silver as a trusted new investment category

Stable Money users already trusted the platform for fixed-income products like FDs and Bonds. But when it came to diversification, there was no clear next step. This project was not just about launching a feature. It was about introducing a new category in a way that felt simple, safe, and worth acting on.

What was being
built

A new Gold & Silver

mutual fund category

Why it
mattered

A logical next step after

FDs and Bonds

Main
challengE

Make a new asset class feel simple and trustworthy

What made it
interesting

Launched in phases, then

evolved post-launch

Project Context

Helping users diversify beyond FDs and Bonds

Helping users diversify beyond FDs and Bonds

Stable Money had already earned trust through fixed-income products. The next opportunity was to help users diversify into Gold & Silver mutual funds without forcing them into products that felt too complex or unfamiliar.


Physical gold felt inconvenient. ETFs needed a Demat account. Digital gold was easier to access, but often lacked the trust and clarity users expected for long-term investing. This created room for a guided, regulated, SIP-friendly product inside Stable Money.

Discovery

Do users trust Gold & Silver mutual funds?

Do users trust Gold & Silver mutual funds?

We started in July with user interviews, market research, competitor walkthroughs, and internal discussions. At this stage, the goal was not to polish UI. It was to understand whether users would trust and understand Gold & Silver mutual funds enough to invest in them.

METHOD

USER INTERVIEWS

Understand mental models, objections, and confidence gaps.

Key finding
  • Users were curious about gold, but not clear on the format

  • Silver was much less understood than gold

  • Trust and reversibility mattered more than advanced features

  • Users wanted guidance, not too many choices upfront

METHOD

Competitor analysis

Map how digital gold, ETFs, and other platforms frame the category.

Key finding
  • Uses Groww for convenience; found Zerodha Coin’s UI tedious

  • Overreliance on Influencers: Selection of MFs often based on YouTube over data-driven advice.

  • Poor Rebalancing Behavior: Users either don’t rebalance or want “someone else” to do it.

  • Auto-Rebalancing Recommendation Engine: Periodic nudges with pre-suggested ratios.

  • SIP Optimizer: Help users understand daily/weekly SIP benefits (if any) using calculators.

  • Commodity Bundles: “Gold + Silver Diversification” MF recommendations as preset baskets.

  • Tax Ignorance may lead to poor experience at redemption time.

METHOD

Market research

Understand where Gold & Silver could sit in Stable Money’s broader portfolio story.

Key finding

No existing product combined SEBI regulation, no Demat requirement, SIP capability, and expert-managed allocation in one place. That was the white space.

User Personas — built from interviews

Built after interviews — not before. Each shaped a distinct communication angle and design priority.

Persona 1

Long-Term Wealth Builder

Persona 2

Inflation Hedge Believer

Persona 3

Equity Diversifier

Persona 4

Goal-Based Investor

Defining the Opportunity

Make first-time investing feel safE

From discovery, we framed the challenge as making Gold & Silver mutual funds feel simple, trustworthy, and actionable for users who were familiar with safer investments, but not yet confident in this category.

How might we make Gold & Silver mutual funds feel simple, trustworthy, and actionable for users who were familiar with safer investments, but not yet confident in this category?

Initial Product Design

Designing the first usable investment journey

From August to October, we focused on shaping the first usable version of the product. That meant getting the information architecture, flow logic, and page responsibilities right before we went deep into later enhancements like personalized mastheads or collections.

Information architecture

I mapped the full journey before designing the details: entry points, discovery, KYC, investment, passbook, and post-investment states.

ENTRY
Discovery
KYC
Investment
Post-investment

Landing page objectives — what this surface should & shouldn't do

Before designing the landing page, defined its job explicitly. A lot of later decisions — content order, trust markers, CTA placement — came directly from this framework.

The page should
  • Answer "what is this?" immediately

  • Explain the Gold+Silver basket clearly

  • Address safety and exit questions proactively

  • Show returns with context (CAGR, benchmark)

  • Build confidence before showing a CTA

  • Explain what KYC is and why it's needed

What it should not do:
  • Assume users know what a Gold MF is

  • List every investment mode upfront

  • Bury withdrawal info below the fold

  • Show raw numbers without framing

  • Push users to KYC before they understand the product

  • Drop users into a form mid-flow

This also shaped the critical KYC placement decision: should we ask for KYC before or after the user has chosen their investment amount?

Decision

KYC after amount selection — users are more committed after seeing their potential return. KYC as a gate before seeing any value felt like friction with no reward.


E2E screen design

full investment journey

Designed the complete journey across 5 surface areas. Every edge case documented before engineering handoff — payment failures, DigiLocker errors, bank verification failures, unit allocation delays.

Strategic pivot

phased delivery & GTM landing page

As engineering progressed, it became clear the full KYC + investment journey would take longer to build than the initial target date. Rather than waiting, we made a deliberate decision: launch in phases.


The first phase was a GTM landing page — not a placeholder, but a purposeful early surface to:



Phase 1

GTM / waitlist page

Phase 2

KYC journey

Phase 3

Full E2E journey

Why this was the right call

Shipping something valuable early — even if incomplete — meant we had real signal about user intent and confusion before the full product went live. It also let us onboard early adopters with a better first experience than a half-finished flow.


STAKEHOLDERS

Collaboration during design

Ashish Kumar · PM

Every edge case documented before engineering handoff. Scope filter: does this reduce support volume or increase CVR? Useful-but-not-urgent (Goal SIP, Step-Up SIP) → documented future scope, not lost.

Vaibhav Grover · Business

Anchored business goals: 12% attach rate by Dec, AUM targets. Pushed for sharper competitive differentiation → drove expansion of comparison table from Digital Gold only to Physical Gold + ETFs.

Better design because of that pushback.

Engineering

Heavy Cybrilla (MF infra) dependencies. Every known failure state had a designed UI: payment failure, DigiLocker error, BAV failure, mandate issues.

Same-day settlement
Mandate edge cases
KYC validation errors
Pre-launch QA

A LOT OF BUGS & issues

Screen-by-screen sign-off across lump sum and SIP flows. P0 = blocker, cannot ship.

Post-launch

Fixing What Was Breaking, Learning What Mattered

The three months post-launch were about keeping the product working, reading the real user signal, and resolving backend issues that were causing drop-off.

What users said
  • "Is there any lock-in?"

  • "Will I get fixed returns like FD?"

  • "Where does my money go?"

  • "What are the charges on withdrawal?"

  • "Why only Axis and UTI?"

  • Explain what KYC is and why it's needed

What it actually meant
  • Trust markers not prominent enough above fold

  • Product framing not landing for FD-first users

  • Axis/UTI fund names not positioned at the right moment

  • Exit load + expense ratio still causing anxiety

  • Fund selection rationale needed more surface area

The key insight

Users weren't rejecting the product — they were confused by it. Every support call was a design problem we hadn't yet solved on the screen. This directly informed the enhancement roadmap for Phase 5.

Backend & technical issues resolved

NEW PHASE

New Features & Enhancements

The three months post-launch were about keeping the product working, reading the real user signal, and resolving backend issues that were causing drop-off.

DEC 2025

PERSONLISATION

Personalised masthead — added in this phase

6 user states, each with a distinct headline and CTA. New user sees an education-first message. Invested user sees portfolio performance. Designed once the full IA was stable and we had real user cohort data to segment on.

JAN 2026

Collections module — simplifying investment entrY

Post-launch data showed users were confused by the number of investment modes available. Collections grouped them by mindset rather than product type, reducing decision paralysis.

Stakeholder compromise

Business wanted all SKUs visible. Collections became primary; 'View all options' secondary. Full discoverability without making it the opening move.

JAN 2026

KYC funnel improvements

KYC was the biggest drop-off point post-launch. Iterated on every step to reduce failure and friction.

Aadhaar step optimised

+0.5% in onboarding.

Modify KYC flow

+1% in onboarding.

Pending journey

27% CVR on nudge.
Jan–Feb 2026

Investment input page improvements

The amount input page was cluttered at launch. Several high-impact changes shipped over Jan–Feb.

  • Editable basket ratio visible on amount page → basket one-time orders 27% → 37%

  • Daily vs Monthly SIP UI revamp → daily SIP share grew 19% → 25.88%

  • Min daily SIP reduced to ₹100 → avg SIP amount doubled (₹109 → ₹197)

  • 90:10 ratio display removed from amount screen (was causing confusion, not value)

Jan 2026

SIP cancellation — education-led friction

Cancellations spiked 20–25% on market-dip days.

Business instinct: add friction.

My approach: add education, preserve autonomy.

  1. User taps 'Stop SIP' → asked: "What's making you stop?" (structured reason list)


  1. "Need money?" → "Stopping your SIP doesn't give you cash. Redeem instead ↗"


  1. "Bad returns?" → 5-year historical performance data shown before confirming cancel

Jan–Feb 2026

SIP rebalancing — transparency as a product feature

When the ratio changed (90:10 → revised split), ~6,800 SIP users' installment amounts would shift. A notification alone would destroy trust.

Design principle

Transparency is the product. Making expert management visible and legible — not just a marketing claim.

RESULT

What the Numbers Say

The three months post-launch were about keeping the product working, reading the real user signal, and resolving backend issues that were causing drop-off.

180%

Growth in AUM after

launch

3X

growth in investors within

2 months

2.5X

Increase in monthly

investments

1.8X

Increase in average

investment

Monthly SIP users
OCT to DEC • 4X increase
Daily SIP userS
OCT to DEC • 4.5X increase
Editable basket ratio on amount page
Basket one-time orders 27% → 37%
Daily vs Monthly SIP UI revamp
Daily SIP share 19% → 25.88%
Min daily SIP reduced to ₹100
Avg SIP amount ₹109 → ₹197
Pending KYC/order journey nudge
32% completed after nudge
Learnings

KEY TAKEAWAYS

1

Launching a New Category ≠ Launching a Perfect Product

2

Simplification Drives Adoption in Commodities

3

Users Want Delegation, Not Control

4

Customer Conversations Became the Real Brief

5

Business Urgency vs User Trust is a Tightrope

6

Timing the Launch Amplified Impact

7

Designing with Constraints, Not Around Them

"In fintech, the product earns trust or loses it the moment users think about getting their money back. If that moment is uncertain or surprising, users won't invest in the first place."

• Fin •

• Fin •

Create a free website with Framer, the website builder loved by startups, designers and agencies.